有效
发表于 2025-3-27 00:55:46
AGM Revision in Logics Without Negation,truction for revision in belief sets that doesn’t depend on negation. This construction is characterized by AGM postulates in well behaved logics. Furthermore, it is presented a set of postulates that characterizes this construction in any distributive and compact logic.
Arctic
发表于 2025-3-27 04:09:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183306/183306_32.png
Nutrient
发表于 2025-3-27 05:27:37
Book 2013 Logics such as the ones behind OWL – Horn Logic and Intuitionistic logic, amongst others. The author also presents algorithms for the most important constructions in belief bases. Researchers and practitioners in theoretical computing will find this an invaluable resource..
gerontocracy
发表于 2025-3-27 12:52:57
2191-5768 -DL.Awarded the best paper prize by the Brazilian Computer S.Since the advent of the Semantic Web, interest in the dynamics of ontologies (ontology evolution) has grown significantly. Belief revision presents a good theoretical framework for dealing with this problem; however, classical belief revis
Comprise
发表于 2025-3-27 14:05:35
Stephan Wildner,Oliver Koch,Uwe Webery to non-classical logics has grown rapidly. The first results on belief revision in Description Logics (DL) showed problems in applying “classical belief revision theory” (AGM theory) to these logics. The aim of this book is to show how to adapt belief revision theory to make it applicable to a wider class of logics that includes most DLs.
padding
发表于 2025-3-27 20:01:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183306/183306_36.png
事物的方面
发表于 2025-3-28 00:27:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16527-7evance and recovery are equivalent. In this chapter, we defend the use of relevance instead of recovery in non-classical logics for mainly three reasons: relevance deals more directly with minimality, it is compliant with a wider class of logics, and it better characterizes partial meet contraction.
FER
发表于 2025-3-28 04:57:03
Introduction,y to non-classical logics has grown rapidly. The first results on belief revision in Description Logics (DL) showed problems in applying “classical belief revision theory” (AGM theory) to these logics. The aim of this book is to show how to adapt belief revision theory to make it applicable to a wider class of logics that includes most DLs.
BILK
发表于 2025-3-28 07:39:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183306/183306_39.png
Parallel
发表于 2025-3-28 11:51:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183306/183306_40.png