四指套
发表于 2025-3-25 04:43:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3261-9significant (in which case they would not even merit discussion). I wish instead to distinguish them from an even more difficult problem to be discussed in succeeding chapters. Relative to that problem, these are minor. Nevertheless, each of the following lines of argumentation have had proponents w
Interim
发表于 2025-3-25 10:27:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3261-9ral. Among philosophers, at least, this argument has had great influence. If there is a consensus among philosophers about the inherent limitations of the behavioral approach to psychology, this argument is largely responsible for it. Historically, this argument emerged as a response to an argument
anaphylaxis
发表于 2025-3-25 12:13:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1828/182776/182776_23.png
门窗的侧柱
发表于 2025-3-25 18:26:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1828/182776/182776_24.png
engagement
发表于 2025-3-25 23:24:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1828/182776/182776_25.png
Additive
发表于 2025-3-26 01:32:38
William W. Chin,Soheyla D. Gharibfew would concede that reference to such entities is necessary to formulate the regularities themselves. They believe that if one studies large units of behavior rather than discrete building blocks, if one focuses upon complex relational stimuli rather than upon simple non-relational stimuli, and i
infelicitous
发表于 2025-3-26 05:46:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8102-8Radical Behaviorism; Skinner; cognitive psychology; cognitive science; science
Institution
发表于 2025-3-26 08:52:19
978-90-481-4393-1Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1994
迁移
发表于 2025-3-26 12:56:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1828/182776/182776_29.png
针叶树
发表于 2025-3-26 19:46:26
The Yin Yang of Cancer Related Inflammationnferred entities himself), but that the evidence does not warrant mentalism’s type of inferred entity. There is no brief way to explain Skinner’s reasons for saying so. His argument gathers force with the development of his experimental program.