Maculate
发表于 2025-3-21 18:04:34
书目名称Beg to Differ影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Beg to Differ读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0182156<br><br> <br><br>
通便
发表于 2025-3-21 21:38:18
Hohle oder gerade Wasserlinien? background information proves not to be adequately clear and the debate starts getting frustrating, then it is always possible to take a step back and discuss the background material a bit more before proceeding.
古董
发表于 2025-3-22 01:56:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1822/182156/182156_3.png
背信
发表于 2025-3-22 07:55:19
Hohle oder gerade Wasserlinien?at begins with a question word and ends with a question mark). Questions with vague wording such as, “how about x, y or z?” are better not taken up. The same goes for unspecified questions, like the question of this or that topic or person or situation. Do not debate definitions of concepts. Instead
多节
发表于 2025-3-22 10:38:18
Theorie des Reibungswiderstandes prove that one is consistent), and those who claim that a certain generalization is false should point at cases that refute it (there is no way to prove a factual generalization). Finally, the side that presents an existential statement (X exists) bears the burden of proof.
不愿
发表于 2025-3-22 13:56:43
Ein Beitrag zum Schiffswellenwiderstandeck which answer is simpler; of two theories that explain the same items, the simpler is usually preferred. Check also whether the theory under dispute successfully predicts previously unknown surprising facts or rather just explains known facts (the latter is much the easier one). Avoid debates wit
赔偿
发表于 2025-3-22 19:45:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1822/182156/182156_7.png
歪曲道理
发表于 2025-3-22 21:13:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1822/182156/182156_8.png
enterprise
发表于 2025-3-23 03:09:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1822/182156/182156_9.png
Exclaim
发表于 2025-3-23 06:46:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1822/182156/182156_10.png