BARB
发表于 2025-3-23 09:49:55
Richie Ang,Owen Noel Newton Fernandoand cultural critic Gilles Deleuze (1925–95). Proust’s ‘roman de l’entre-deux’ , as Antoine Compagnon has described ., provides the pivot, in this volume, on which Beckett and Deleuze balance their positions, constantly shifting in relation to Proust and to each other. Proust, the
手段
发表于 2025-3-23 14:17:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1820/181982/181982_12.png
全面
发表于 2025-3-23 18:12:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1820/181982/181982_13.png
Hamper
发表于 2025-3-24 00:27:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1820/181982/181982_14.png
LASH
发表于 2025-3-24 03:00:24
Marcielo Bell,June Wei,Guillermo Francia III a first reading of ., is the assumption that this essay is an excavation, a literary critical exegesis of signs at work in Proust’s text. Jonathan Culler, in his ., captures the wonder such a reading of Deleuze will inevitably provoke:
neurologist
发表于 2025-3-24 07:36:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1820/181982/181982_16.png
RADE
发表于 2025-3-24 11:20:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1820/181982/181982_17.png
仔细检查
发表于 2025-3-24 18:45:17
Signs and Subjectivity in , anda first reading of ., is the assumption that this essay is an excavation, a literary critical exegesis of signs at work in Proust’s text. Jonathan Culler, in his ., captures the wonder such a reading of Deleuze will inevitably provoke:
新义
发表于 2025-3-24 19:24:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1820/181982/181982_19.png
业余爱好者
发表于 2025-3-25 01:31:31
The Embarrassment of Meeting: Burroughs, Beckett, Proust (and Deleuze)go, Beckett shook hands with them. ‘Clearly’, recalled Burroughs, ‘he had not the slightest desire to see any of them ever again. You could imagine him turning in disinterest from an extraterrestrial’ ., p.31).