aplomb 发表于 2025-3-26 21:32:35

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_31.png

insular 发表于 2025-3-27 03:53:55

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_32.png

FELON 发表于 2025-3-27 05:49:38

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_33.png

Ingrained 发表于 2025-3-27 12:46:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_34.png

acrophobia 发表于 2025-3-27 16:26:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_35.png

核心 发表于 2025-3-27 20:01:13

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_36.png

遵循的规范 发表于 2025-3-27 22:04:59

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_37.png

认为 发表于 2025-3-28 02:45:43

The Birth of Multicausality as the Death of Causality and Their Statistical Corollaries,After an initial and ancient belief in single causes supported by classic philosophers and nineteenth century physicians like Koch that can be expressed as a monocausality view, the complexity of real medical and toxicological problems forced researchers to embrace the notion of multicausality and s

拾落穗 发表于 2025-3-28 08:10:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_39.png

减去 发表于 2025-3-28 12:52:49

,And the Winner Is…,statistics. The notion of epistemological opportunism and the consideration of sciences as problem-solving activities make it possible to understand the fierce statistical debates as well as show us a way to find a winner to the contest: Bayesianism. At the same time, the possibility of the notion o
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Bayesians Versus Frequentists; A Philosophical Deba Jordi Vallverdú Book 2016 The Author(s) 2016 00A30, 01Axx, 62-03.Bayesian.causality.det