aplomb 发表于 2025-3-26 21:32:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_31.pnginsular 发表于 2025-3-27 03:53:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_32.pngFELON 发表于 2025-3-27 05:49:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_33.pngIngrained 发表于 2025-3-27 12:46:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_34.pngacrophobia 发表于 2025-3-27 16:26:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_35.png核心 发表于 2025-3-27 20:01:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_36.png遵循的规范 发表于 2025-3-27 22:04:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_37.png认为 发表于 2025-3-28 02:45:43
The Birth of Multicausality as the Death of Causality and Their Statistical Corollaries,After an initial and ancient belief in single causes supported by classic philosophers and nineteenth century physicians like Koch that can be expressed as a monocausality view, the complexity of real medical and toxicological problems forced researchers to embrace the notion of multicausality and s拾落穗 发表于 2025-3-28 08:10:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181893/181893_39.png减去 发表于 2025-3-28 12:52:49
,And the Winner Is…,statistics. The notion of epistemological opportunism and the consideration of sciences as problem-solving activities make it possible to understand the fierce statistical debates as well as show us a way to find a winner to the contest: Bayesianism. At the same time, the possibility of the notion o