雄伟 发表于 2025-3-28 14:55:05

Upping the Stakes and the Preface Paradoxain of each of a set of propositions without being evidentially certain of the conjunction of the set of propositions. Given reasonable assumptions about the nature of evidential certainty, this appears to be a straightforward contradiction. We solve the paradox by appeal to stake size sensitivity,

无情 发表于 2025-3-28 22:18:25

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181829/181829_42.png

Senescent 发表于 2025-3-29 01:11:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181829/181829_43.png

忘恩负义的人 发表于 2025-3-29 05:59:20

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07813-6e another piece of evidence which is clearly objectionable: statistical evidence on the rate of smothering among mothers who are similar to Clark. Regardless of whether the exercise of comparing probabilities of SIDS and smothering is feasible, such an exercise should not be conducted as part of cri

concentrate 发表于 2025-3-29 11:14:20

A Survey of the Brain Stem Morphologyergence are not necessarily the result of mere irrational “group think” but that even ideally rational inquirers will predictably polarize or diverge under realistic conditions. The concluding section comments on the relation between the present model and the influential and empirically robust Persu

Urgency 发表于 2025-3-29 13:48:23

Nianming Ban,Chao Qu,Daqin Feng,Jiahui Pangent’s beliefs are represented two-dimensionally as a bid-ask spread, which gives a bid price and an ask price for bets at each stake size. The bid-ask spread gets wider when there is less valuable evidence relative to the stake size and narrower when there is more valuable evidence according to a s

Efflorescent 发表于 2025-3-29 18:13:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181829/181829_47.png

使纠缠 发表于 2025-3-29 21:37:23

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1819/181829/181829_48.png
页: 1 2 3 4 [5]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Bayesian Argumentation; The practical side o Frank Zenker Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Ad Hominem Argument Baye