AUGUR 发表于 2025-3-25 05:20:07
Andrés Tomás,Zhaojun Bai,Vicente Hernándezncern was with the internal organisation of states: the system of government that would best promote the welfare of their peoples. This was the theme of the best known works of the period, . of Plato and the . of Aristotle. Both of these touch only in passing on the relationships that should be estaBULLY 发表于 2025-3-25 09:26:12
Joshua Dennis Booth,Padma Raghavanbvious conclusion: the greater the influence which ordinary people could secure over their governments — in other words, the more “democratic” governments became — the more likely it was that peace would be secured.concise 发表于 2025-3-25 12:26:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17353-5rtain that ordinary people were always peacefully inclined. Even a state having parliamentary institutions might be aggressive in its conduct if its peoples were inspired by strongly nationalistic sentiments.一大群 发表于 2025-3-25 19:40:12
Fan Ye,Christophe Calvin,Serge G. Petitons consciousness. If attitudes and actions were influenced not by national sentiment but only by class loyalty, as some of these writers appeared to hope, wars between states might cease to occur and a new type of international society come into being.使成波状 发表于 2025-3-25 20:38:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1812/181174/181174_25.pngstratum-corneum 发表于 2025-3-26 02:33:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1812/181174/181174_26.png锡箔纸 发表于 2025-3-26 04:27:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1812/181174/181174_27.png易怒 发表于 2025-3-26 12:03:16
Mehmet Akif Aydoğmuş,M. Oğuzhan Külekcin and Hobbes (pp. 136 and 40 above) had in effect declared that the ruler could do as he pleased within his own lands; and that those who had previously enjoyed rights independent of the prince — feudal lords, municipalities and the church — were subject to his sovereign power. The most fundamentalopprobrious 发表于 2025-3-26 15:51:54
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/181174.jpg忍耐 发表于 2025-3-26 20:21:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1812/181174/181174_30.png