receptors 发表于 2025-3-25 07:10:04

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181082/181082_21.png

DENT 发表于 2025-3-25 09:27:42

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60094-5losely related to the idea of ‘coordinatisation’. The meaning of coordinatisation is to specify objects forming a homogeneous set . by assigning individually distinguishable quantities to them. Of course such a specification is in principle impossible: considering the inverse map would then make the

ORBIT 发表于 2025-3-25 14:46:07

Adrian Mindel MB, BCh, MSc, MRCPplest properties. For simplicity, we will assume that the fields under consideration are of characteristic 0, although in fact all the main results hold in much greater generality, for example, also for finite fields.

Tartar 发表于 2025-3-25 17:14:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181082/181082_24.png

团结 发表于 2025-3-25 21:15:08

Heroism and Gender in War FilmsA further difference of principle between arbitrary commutative rings and fields is the existence of nontrivial homomorphisms. A . of a ring . to a ring . is a map .: . → . such that.(we write 1. and 1. for the identity elements of . of .). An . is a homomorphism having an inverse.

heterodox 发表于 2025-3-26 00:08:19

“What Shall the History Books Read?”Consider some domain . in space and the vector fields defined on it. These can be added and multiplied by numbers, carrying out these operations on vectors applied to one point. Thus all vector fields form an infinite-dimensional vector space. But in addition to this, they can be multiplied by functions.

crockery 发表于 2025-3-26 08:11:36

The Postwar Anxiety of the American Pin-UpConsidering quantities ‘up to infinitesimals of order .’ can be translated in algebraic terms quite conveniently, considering elements ε (of certain rings) satisfying ε. = 0 as analogues of infinitesimals. Suppose, for example, that . is an algebraic curve, for simplicity considered over the complex field ℂ.

全面 发表于 2025-3-26 11:48:38

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137362537A . over an arbitrary ring . is defined in the same way as in the case of a commutative ring: it is a set . such that for any two elements ., . ∈ ., the sum . + . is defined, and for . ∈ . and . ∈ . the product . ∈ . is defined, satisfying the following conditions (for all ., ., . ∈ . ∈ .).

头脑冷静 发表于 2025-3-26 14:23:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181082/181082_29.png

束以马具 发表于 2025-3-26 19:14:22

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1811/181082/181082_30.png
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Basic Notions of Algebra; Igor R. Shafarevich Book 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005 Category theory.Group representation.Group