backdrop
发表于 2025-3-25 07:15:33
A Comparison of the English and New Zealand General Practice Sub-Systems,etween general practitioners and the state in England is contrasted with the growth of a multi-payer system in New Zealand in which general practitioners had a fractious relationship and no formal partnership with the state.
Aggressive
发表于 2025-3-25 10:55:43
,Utility of Kingdon’s Framework: Policymaking in England,e. Kingdon’s Framework is the most useful approach but fails to encourage recognition of the powerful institutional and interest group factors at work. Amendments to the Framework to reflect ownership and governance arrangements and the role of state-appointed institutional entrepreneurs are recommended.
Eviction
发表于 2025-3-25 13:27:25
,Utility of Kingdon’s Framework: Policymaking in New Zealand,l. However, it fails to encourage recognition of the powerful institutional and interest group factors or the influence of history at work. Amendments to the Framework reflecting historical antecedents, ownership and governance arrangements, and the role of state-appointed institutional entrepreneurs are recommended.
agonist
发表于 2025-3-25 17:12:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1809/180827/180827_24.png
闯入
发表于 2025-3-25 22:31:42
A Tale of Two Countries,g the comparative utility of single-approach theories that cite the influence of institutions, interest groups, the rational choices made by individuals, ideas or socio-economic factors, and a multi-theoretic approach, John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework.
思考而得
发表于 2025-3-26 02:51:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1809/180827/180827_26.png
终止
发表于 2025-3-26 06:36:43
New Zealand: Context and the Performance Programme,e detailed story of the process to bring these to fruition are told in rich detail, often in the voices of the policymakers. The reader is allowed to see who was involved, what was done, how it was done and how it was implemented. Significant barriers that threatened the process and enablers that supported it are described and discussed.
不遵守
发表于 2025-3-26 08:27:53
Conclusion,and New Zealand between 2001 and 2007. Rare rich descriptions of public policymaking in the general practice sub-systems of these two countries are delivered, offering many insights of both practical and theoretical assistance to those interested in the dynamics of policymaking.
EPT
发表于 2025-3-26 14:03:35
stminster majoritarian jurisdictions is tested and, based on rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement. .The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to negotiate successfully with general practitioners. .978-981-10-7602-2
cylinder
发表于 2025-3-26 17:07:06
Book 2018ucted in England and New Zealand. The Framework’s explanatory power for policymaking in Westminster majoritarian jurisdictions is tested and, based on rigorous comparative analysis, recommendations are made for its refinement. .The monograph also offers striking lessons for policymakers about how to