NOCT
发表于 2025-3-27 00:14:55
Recontextualizing Non-Bakhtinian Theories of Language: a Bakhtinian AnalysisIn this chapter I will suggest how to ‘think dialogically’ about one particular cultural tradition, that of language studies mainly within one scholarly discipline, namely linguistics. Even if my account will not be a straightforward application of Bakhtinian thinking, it is, I would argue, very much in the spirit of Bakhtin.
沉积物
发表于 2025-3-27 01:48:10
Thought Drawing’: Dialogical Thinking and Dialogical Culture at the Trondheim Academy of Fine ArtThe project . at The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) is a multidisciplinary effort whose purpose is to develop a historical and systematic understanding of the relationship between historical concepts of culture and various cultural practices of today.
Habituate
发表于 2025-3-27 06:10:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1804/180399/180399_33.png
Fracture
发表于 2025-3-27 10:17:34
978-1-349-51312-3Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004
一回合
发表于 2025-3-27 14:41:27
Zum Mehrwert der Organisationssoziologie,g from the need to discuss essentialism in the theory of culture critically. Two main concepts of culture implied by Bakhtin’s Simmelian epithet (Simmel 1997), above, are: first, one that we may call essentialist. This concept has ancient roots in the Western history of philosophy, but no longer fee
鄙视读作
发表于 2025-3-27 21:12:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1804/180399/180399_36.png
惊呼
发表于 2025-3-27 22:19:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1804/180399/180399_37.png
轻打
发表于 2025-3-28 04:04:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39559-9ther work in the Bakhtin Circle as mainly triadic, that is, seeing utterance, genre and communication as dynamics of structure, reference and action. The overall dominant classification or framing of his work is dialogical (indeed in many different versions) and never in any deep sense triadic. This
crucial
发表于 2025-3-28 09:02:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39559-9nted the idea that a linguistic expression has an invariant linguistic meaning or a semantic representation independent of actual situated language use.. In dialogism, this view is rejected and a linguistic expression is considered as a relatively open meaning potential, that is, a multiplicity of p
echnic
发表于 2025-3-28 14:01:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1804/180399/180399_40.png