易弯曲 发表于 2025-3-26 20:56:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167728/167728_31.png睨视 发表于 2025-3-27 02:28:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167728/167728_32.png哪有黄油 发表于 2025-3-27 06:26:30
Euclid: Doing and Showingants to interpret it in modern terms; in order to see the difference between the modern mathematical thinking and older ways of mathematical thinking one wants to avoid anachronisms and understand the old text in its own terms (Unguru 1975).epinephrine 发表于 2025-3-27 11:51:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167728/167728_34.png头脑冷静 发表于 2025-3-27 15:51:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167728/167728_35.pngMalfunction 发表于 2025-3-27 20:53:32
Identity in Classical and Constructive Mathematicstes the apple when green, and B when it is red then . = . (it is the same thing) but the properties of . and . are different: they have a different color. This is at odds with the Indiscernibility of Identicals thesis according to which identical things have identical properties.Venules 发表于 2025-3-28 01:14:38
How Mathematical Concepts Get Their Bodies claim applies to Euclid’s geometry, that is, how exactly concepts and intuitions work here closely together. In this Chapter I consider a question that Kant himself never systematically studied, namely the question of how mathematics develops. It is obvious that mathematical concepts change throughDiatribe 发表于 2025-3-28 02:09:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167728/167728_38.png瘙痒 发表于 2025-3-28 09:53:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167728/167728_39.pngTerminal 发表于 2025-3-28 11:56:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167728/167728_40.png