Cupidity 发表于 2025-3-28 17:10:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167726/167726_41.png造反,叛乱 发表于 2025-3-28 22:43:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167726/167726_42.pngrestrain 发表于 2025-3-29 01:15:22
ContingencyAP7 and AP8 do not exclude (on the basis of AP1 — AP6) “..” Nevertheless, the world is not the minimal state of affairs. Otherwise there would be only one obtaining state of affairs: the minimal state of affairs.裙带关系 发表于 2025-3-29 03:46:28
A Further Examination of Axioms AP7 — AP9The general basis for examining AP7, AP8 and AP9 with respect to their deductive relations to each other and to other statements is the system AP1 — AP6 and the accompanying definitions (under the current interpretation of LP with respect to the universe of states of affairs).lactic 发表于 2025-3-29 09:27:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167726/167726_45.png蛰伏 发表于 2025-3-29 12:13:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167726/167726_46.pngcoagulation 发表于 2025-3-29 18:42:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167726/167726_47.pngglucagon 发表于 2025-3-29 20:33:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167726/167726_48.pngchandel 发表于 2025-3-30 01:48:55
Axiomatic Formal Ontology978-94-015-8867-6Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292BOLT 发表于 2025-3-30 05:08:06
Sonja Novković,Karen Miner,Cian McMahonor if it were, then . state of affairs would be an obtaining state of affairs, according to DP31, since the contradictory state of affairs is ., the . state of affairs, of which all states of affairs are (intensional) parts. There is, however, no doubt that some states of affairs do not obtain.