geriatrician 发表于 2025-3-25 04:04:27
,Introduction: Answers to Axel Honneth,authors analyze the current direction of critical theory, contextualize it both intellectually and politically, and develop their own visions and suggestions of “what is to be done” in order to maintain critical theory’s scholarly and “emancipatory intent.”龙卷风 发表于 2025-3-25 10:15:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167710/167710_22.png令人作呕 发表于 2025-3-25 13:49:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167710/167710_23.png脱水 发表于 2025-3-25 18:09:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167710/167710_24.pngMagisterial 发表于 2025-3-25 23:38:55
2524-714X ies Honneth‘s theory in the context of contemporary politica.The critical theory of the .Frankfurt School .has undergone numerous and at times fundamental changes over the last ninety years. Since the late 1960s, it has been characterized primarily by Jürgen Habermas’s “communicative turn” and a focBrain-Waves 发表于 2025-3-26 02:33:04
,Geometric Basis of Human–Like Biomechanics,ant point of departure for Honneth’s early research. This chapter attempts to demonstrate the contrary: that Honneth’s middle and most recent writings represents an abandonment of the basic convictions of his own earlier work, which was indeed consonant with Thompson, Moore, and others and which, partly for that reason, held considerable promise.Concerto 发表于 2025-3-26 07:40:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167710/167710_27.pngalcoholism 发表于 2025-3-26 12:06:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167710/167710_28.pngHeart-Rate 发表于 2025-3-26 13:05:33
,Geometric Basis of Human–Like Biomechanics,getfulness of recognition.” Finally, I proceed to answer the above question by deploying Lukács’s theory to summarize some of the dispersed critiques of Honneth’s theory of reification that have been formulated in the relevant bibliography. From a Lukácsian point of view Honneth’s anthropological coHay-Fever 发表于 2025-3-26 16:59:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1678/167710/167710_30.png