Rustproof
发表于 2025-3-25 04:35:30
R. F. Haynes,I. Lerche,P. G. Murdin community. Indeed, the latter view, indicating no normative criterion of legislation, is left open to the risk of the dictatorship of majority. In other words, Feinberg’s view seems to nullify what is the main goal of freedom for the liberal tradition: to define a domain within which an individual is able to do what the majority dislikes.
衰老
发表于 2025-3-25 09:06:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166831/166831_22.png
中古
发表于 2025-3-25 15:26:42
Introduction,nd, provided by the value of individual autonomy. Among legal philosophers, Herbert Hart in particular enthusiastically welcomed the development of this approach, claiming that it would eventually provide a ‘fairly firm’ anchoring for basic rights.
Exuberance
发表于 2025-3-25 15:58:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166831/166831_24.png
CALL
发表于 2025-3-25 22:05:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166831/166831_25.png
Scintillations
发表于 2025-3-26 03:45:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166831/166831_26.png
epinephrine
发表于 2025-3-26 06:33:55
Neo-Contractarianism and the Double Order of Desires,re of liberal theory and the anchor of basic rights was premised on revisiting the Lockean anthropological model. In a 1971 celebrated essay titled . Henry Frankfurt revamped the hierarchical-dualist model arguing that men’s distinctive feature is their capacity not only of ‘first-order desires’ but
Debrief
发表于 2025-3-26 10:19:57
Conclusion,It has one limitation, however: it renders individuals’ assessment as to whether obstacles to the possibility of acting impinge upon their personal freedom completely irrelevant. This is true both for Berlin’s view that options available to individuals should be determined with reference to the libe
daredevil
发表于 2025-3-26 15:00:09
8楼
含水层
发表于 2025-3-26 17:05:57
8楼