FADE
发表于 2025-3-26 21:58:27
Autonomy as Pure Rationalityur treatment of animals in modern factory farms is cruel … the list is endless. However nobody, as far as I know, thinks that there is anything wrong in principle with growing crops simply to feed ourselves, and most people think it is all right to rear animals for food, provided that they are not made to suffer.
牲畜栏
发表于 2025-3-27 04:27:55
The Liberty Principlest give you a good reason to attempt to tell him the truth about his son’s mission before it was too late. But suppose you are unable to persuade him in time; for he rationally has great confidence in his son’s reliability, you are a complete stranger, and in any case you do not speak the same langu
forecast
发表于 2025-3-27 07:58:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166813/166813_33.png
不能和解
发表于 2025-3-27 09:55:20
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencest give you a good reason to attempt to tell him the truth about his son’s mission before it was too late. But suppose you are unable to persuade him in time; for he rationally has great confidence in his son’s reliability, you are a complete stranger, and in any case you do not speak the same langu
名字
发表于 2025-3-27 17:20:35
Kristen M. Campbell,P. Thomas Fletchertheir own lives: no justification for their lack of autonomy is offered — indeed, their lack of autonomy is scarcely recognised. These are the masses, who, according to some radical socialists, suffer from ‘false consciousness’. If indeed it is true that liberal democratic societies fail to defend a
tolerance
发表于 2025-3-27 21:41:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166813/166813_36.png
AWL
发表于 2025-3-28 01:14:35
Autonomy as Pure Rationality of angles: we have damaged soil through over-use; our use of the land is very wasteful; many starve, whilst others live a life of excessive luxury; our treatment of animals in modern factory farms is cruel … the list is endless. However nobody, as far as I know, thinks that there is anything wrong
obsolete
发表于 2025-3-28 05:23:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166813/166813_38.png
PAC
发表于 2025-3-28 09:24:51
Socrates and the Fools for action is false. Reasons for action are not directly proportional to strength of inclination. Second, the Humean account allows an insufficient role for the rational agent in action. Kant recognised the importance of active agency for autonomy, but his account of activity is flawed for reasons
Ruptured-Disk
发表于 2025-3-28 13:10:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1669/166813/166813_40.png