Commonplace 发表于 2025-3-25 03:55:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_21.pngBRIEF 发表于 2025-3-25 07:51:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_22.png迎合 发表于 2025-3-25 13:03:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_23.pngescalate 发表于 2025-3-25 19:37:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_24.pngHeretical 发表于 2025-3-25 21:06:29
Edward Braddock in America: Provincial Politics, Indian Alliances and the Prolonged and Arduous Mar individual colonies. There also existed very real divisions between tidewater and frontier settlements, particularly in Pennsylvania and Virginia. Though these would be most evidently exemplified after Braddock’s defeat, the fact remained that the pacifist Quakers refused to properly defend frontieCLEFT 发表于 2025-3-26 00:43:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_26.pngAura231 发表于 2025-3-26 08:11:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_27.pngCLASH 发表于 2025-3-26 11:18:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_28.pngNEX 发表于 2025-3-26 14:21:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163972/163972_29.png天赋 发表于 2025-3-26 18:36:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-28742-2land, a very capable but profoundly uncompromising soldier-statesman, would epitomize the latter analogy. Ultimately, it was the belligerent Cumberland who would win this ideological clash of constitutional titans, and General Edward Braddock, a very conventional officer, distinctly of the Cumberlan