acrophobia 发表于 2025-3-25 06:04:15
Elisabeth Arend,Wolfgang Asholt,Jürgen Grimmrrect religion or one correct path to the ultimate. After doing so, Lorkowski then briefly discusses the kinds of actual, historical harm that religious dogma has caused before isolating the major contributors that must be avoided—intolerance, fanaticism, textual fundamentalism, and a focus on principles other than morality.使害羞 发表于 2025-3-25 09:59:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163928/163928_22.png游行 发表于 2025-3-25 15:25:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163928/163928_23.png来就得意 发表于 2025-3-25 16:03:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163928/163928_24.png遍及 发表于 2025-3-25 20:19:27
Textbook 2021worldview, C.M. Lorkowski charitably refutes the classical arguments for the existence of god, pointing out flaws in their underlying reasoning and highlighting difficulties inherent to revealed sources. In place of a theistic worldview, he argues for adopting a naturalistic one, highlighting natur来自于 发表于 2025-3-26 00:41:31
Introduction and Overview,oduction to these topics that at the same time aids in the development of an informed worldview, rather than as the final word on the subject or a collection of fodder to be employed against religion.无思维能力 发表于 2025-3-26 07:05:29
The Burden of Proof,stence claim that is neither normally accessible nor supported by scholarly consensus, and further posits an existence very unlike those found in shared neutral evidence, they, rather than the atheist naturalist, must accept the burden of proof in defending their view.intrigue 发表于 2025-3-26 12:13:56
Theology and Reason, that we cannot apply reason to theological matters. Finally, the author briefly outlines how arguments are to be evaluated generally before situating natural theology of this type into the Western tradition.希望 发表于 2025-3-26 14:44:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163928/163928_29.pngconnoisseur 发表于 2025-3-26 19:06:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1640/163928/163928_30.png