格子架
发表于 2025-3-23 13:01:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55687-0re.. The treaty also insisted on the equality between officers of the British Queen and those of the Chinese Empire. It even stipulated exactly in which form the British officers and merchants were allowed to address their Chinese counterparts. Never again should Britons be humiliated by Chinese officials demanding ‘petitions’.
Gastric
发表于 2025-3-23 17:54:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1630/162973/162973_12.png
向宇宙
发表于 2025-3-23 18:40:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1630/162973/162973_13.png
chisel
发表于 2025-3-23 22:32:44
Book 2009British knowledge about China changed fundamentally in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Rather than treating these changes in British understanding as if Anglo-Sino relations were purely bilateral, this study looks at how British imperial networks in India and Southeast Asia were critical mediators in the British encounter of China.
forecast
发表于 2025-3-24 05:19:36
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246751China; edition; empire; expansion; India; knowledge; media; understanding
PALSY
发表于 2025-3-24 08:03:27
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009
brother
发表于 2025-3-24 13:56:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1630/162973/162973_17.png
compose
发表于 2025-3-24 17:00:22
2635-1633 h understanding as if Anglo-Sino relations were purely bilateral, this study looks at how British imperial networks in India and Southeast Asia were critical mediators in the British encounter of China.978-0-230-24675-1Series ISSN 2635-1633 Series E-ISSN 2635-1641
CRAMP
发表于 2025-3-24 21:53:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1630/162973/162973_19.png
燕麦
发表于 2025-3-24 23:30:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1630/162973/162973_20.png