tricuspid-valve 发表于 2025-3-21 17:16:39
书目名称Art Matters影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Art Matters读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0161809<br><br> <br><br>dissent 发表于 2025-3-21 22:52:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1619/161809/161809_2.pngEmasculate 发表于 2025-3-22 03:51:01
A Pair of Shoes, thing + artistic addendum, however that is to be understood. With reference to Kant, I pointed out that such insistence on the thingly character of the work of art is not at all as unproblematic as Heidegger here seems to take it. Heidegger’s turn to the thing demands thoughtful questioning.缺乏 发表于 2025-3-22 05:11:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1619/161809/161809_4.png无能力之人 发表于 2025-3-22 09:21:25
Truth and Art, the thing to the human intellect? This becomes what Heidegger calls the truth of beings and identifies with the “opening up of the Being of beings”. That “opening up of the Being of beings” presents itself to us as Heidegger’s recasting of the Latin .. To be sure, adaequatio is hardly the right word for what Heidegger has in mind.误传 发表于 2025-3-22 16:13:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1619/161809/161809_6.png壮观的游行 发表于 2025-3-22 17:24:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1619/161809/161809_7.pngBOAST 发表于 2025-3-23 01:04:33
Externe und interne Fixateursysteme incompleteness by linking it to a certain one-sidedness of Heidegger’s analysis of authenticity. Instead of “one-sidedness” I could also have spoken of the all too formal character of Heidegger’s analysis of authenticity.中止 发表于 2025-3-23 05:01:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1619/161809/161809_9.pngCanyon 发表于 2025-3-23 07:12:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1619/161809/161809_10.png