做作
发表于 2025-3-23 11:11:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161540/161540_11.png
Dappled
发表于 2025-3-23 15:16:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161540/161540_12.png
MAL
发表于 2025-3-23 18:28:52
Guillaume Morel,Philippe Bidaudquisition induced by rebut. They are derived from two distinctive and advantageous apparatuses of our approach to multi-valued argumentation under : Paraconsistency and multiple-valuedness that EALP and LMA feature. We describe an overall argument example to show the effectiveness and usefulness of
NEG
发表于 2025-3-24 01:47:14
Towards a new Robot Generation,ind of decision consists of selecting among different alternatives (eg. different offers), the best one that, according to some . of the agent, will satisfy the . of the agent. The paper proposes then a formal model based on argumentation for computing on the basis of the above kinds of mental state
OWL
发表于 2025-3-24 05:18:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161540/161540_15.png
exacerbate
发表于 2025-3-24 08:35:11
An Argumentation-Based Approach for Dialog Move Selectionind of decision consists of selecting among different alternatives (eg. different offers), the best one that, according to some . of the agent, will satisfy the . of the agent. The paper proposes then a formal model based on argumentation for computing on the basis of the above kinds of mental state
SNEER
发表于 2025-3-24 13:10:01
0302-9743 the AAMAS 2006 main conference, as well as from ECAI 2006, the biennial European Conference on Artificial Intelligence..978-3-540-75525-8978-3-540-75526-5Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349
Lacunar-Stroke
发表于 2025-3-24 15:22:10
A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Argutacks. In this paper we propose a generalization of the framework of Dung, which allows for sets of arguments to attack other arguments. We extend the semantics associated with the original framework to this generalization, and prove that all results in the paper by Dung have an equivalent in this more abstract framework.
较早
发表于 2025-3-24 20:56:29
Carlo Tomasi,John Zhang,David Redkeytacks. In this paper we propose a generalization of the framework of Dung, which allows for sets of arguments to attack other arguments. We extend the semantics associated with the original framework to this generalization, and prove that all results in the paper by Dung have an equivalent in this more abstract framework.
惹人反感
发表于 2025-3-25 01:33:08
0302-9743 e a solid contribution to the practice of multiagent dialogues. Application domains include: legal disputes, business negotiation, labor disputes, team formation, scientific inquiry, deliberative democracy, ontology reconciliation, risk analysis, scheduling, and logistics...This book constitutes the