adj忧郁的
发表于 2025-3-23 11:53:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161529/161529_11.png
陈腐的人
发表于 2025-3-23 14:31:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161529/161529_12.png
exhilaration
发表于 2025-3-23 20:27:22
The Force and the Reason of Experiment,or conducting argumentative discourse. These communicative activity types can be characterized argumentatively by describing the specific conventionalization that is instrumental to realizing their institutional point. Starting from the argumentative characterization, the institutional preconditions
严厉批评
发表于 2025-3-24 00:50:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161529/161529_14.png
欢腾
发表于 2025-3-24 03:34:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161529/161529_15.png
休息
发表于 2025-3-24 09:46:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1616/161529/161529_16.png
连接
发表于 2025-3-24 10:40:26
A Model of a Critical Discussion,tion of profiles of dialectically relevant argumentative moves has been introduced as a way of portraying the various dialectical routes that can be chosen in a critical discussion, dialectical profiles are sketched of the main types of argumentation: symptomatic argumentation, comparison argumentation, and causal argumentation.
critique
发表于 2025-3-24 17:52:45
1566-7650 rspective.Provides readers with a better and more complete u.The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it
jeopardize
发表于 2025-3-24 19:04:30
Lecture Notes in Computer Science and fallacy. Then the research program of argumentation theory is explained, consisting of a philosophical, a theoretical, an empirical, an analytical, and a practical component. The chapter is concluded by a brief overview of the various approaches that give shape to the dialectical and the rhetorical perspectives on argumentation.
骗子
发表于 2025-3-25 01:08:21
Argumentation Theory as a Discipline, and fallacy. Then the research program of argumentation theory is explained, consisting of a philosophical, a theoretical, an empirical, an analytical, and a practical component. The chapter is concluded by a brief overview of the various approaches that give shape to the dialectical and the rhetorical perspectives on argumentation.