nurture
发表于 2025-3-26 23:48:35
Mass Dictatorship in the Twentieth Centuryon relates to “communist archaeology” and its peculiarities. I examine key political events to see how they relate to the status of archaeology at the time. Consequently, I point out to the overwhelming political control of archaeology in the early years of communism of the late 1940s and the 1950s
Conspiracy
发表于 2025-3-27 03:45:21
Mass Dictatorship in the Twentieth Centuryatus of archaeology in the country by discussing four specific contexts: place of archaeology with the social (historical) sciences, archaeological training at universities, themes of archaeological research, and the use of archaeological data to fit ideological demands regarding history of the regi
男学院
发表于 2025-3-27 05:41:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1613/161206/161206_33.png
有偏见
发表于 2025-3-27 10:52:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1613/161206/161206_34.png
聚集
发表于 2025-3-27 15:19:43
The Postmodern Sacred in Americarstly the intellectual context in which research was conducted and in which each person engaged in scientific research was embedded, even if often unwittingly, and secondly, I reveal the political condition of research. I thus examine the relationship between East German archaeology and ideology div
GAVEL
发表于 2025-3-27 19:52:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1613/161206/161206_36.png
OVER
发表于 2025-3-27 23:06:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1613/161206/161206_37.png
Endoscope
发表于 2025-3-28 05:36:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1613/161206/161206_38.png
Mutter
发表于 2025-3-28 09:32:52
Ludomir R LoznyHighlights the political conditions that influenced archaeological theory and practice during the communist era worldwide.Addresses the overall impact of Soviet archaeology by contrasting it directly
大洪水
发表于 2025-3-28 11:58:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1613/161206/161206_40.png