tympanometry
发表于 2025-3-25 07:12:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160281/160281_21.png
元音
发表于 2025-3-25 09:58:13
Lakatos, Reason and Historyts like Richard Boyd or William Newton-Smith do not fit in here either. Their project is very much like that of the conventionalists, even though they reach practically the opposite conclusions. Kuhn and the other historically-minded authors also stand apart, for their approach is emphatically descr
creditor
发表于 2025-3-25 12:28:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160281/160281_23.png
HALO
发表于 2025-3-25 19:23:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160281/160281_24.png
使满足
发表于 2025-3-25 21:23:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160281/160281_25.png
裂口
发表于 2025-3-26 02:53:39
Lakatos’ Criticisms Of Poppert give this impression. The reason for this paradoxical situation is perhaps that at the centre of Imre Lakatos’ philosophy there is a dialectical concept of continual change. His own changes of opinion are, consequently, compatible with his philosophical vision of the world.
murmur
发表于 2025-3-26 05:22:39
Lakatos’ Mitigated Scepticism in the Philosophy of Mathematicsicism (often called critical fallibilism). Like the sceptics, he held A) that we cannot attain truth, or at least B) that we cannot know that we have attained truth, but he held in addition — and in this respect he distinguished himself from extreme sceptics — C) that we can improve our knowledge and know that we have improved it.
侵略
发表于 2025-3-26 10:58:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160281/160281_28.png
FAZE
发表于 2025-3-26 13:54:37
1571-308325 years after his untimely death, it is time for a critical re-evaluation of his ideas. His main theme of locating rationality within the scientific process appears even more compelling today, after many historical case studies have revealed the cultural and societal elements within scientific pra
我不死扛
发表于 2025-3-26 17:27:23
Anhang B: Stochastische Konzepte, that man had the duty of using reason in his private affairs as well as in any enquiry concerning the relation between himself, nature, and his fellow men”; and as “an ., for he thought that reason was capable of solving most of the problems arising in the course of such an inquiry” (Feyerabend, 1975b, p. 1).