exclusice 发表于 2025-3-25 06:28:02
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137407009communication; Institution; methods; Nation; nationalism; Pierre Bourdieu; sociologyADAGE 发表于 2025-3-25 07:59:55
978-1-349-47904-7Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013acrimony 发表于 2025-3-25 14:03:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160265/160265_23.pngHumble 发表于 2025-3-25 17:04:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0060730 have been struggling to establish their collective identities as separate autochthonous “nations” with respective distinct cultural histories and so were they analyzed by sociologists, anthropologists, and historians. Reproducing theoretical teleologies and paradigmatic “groupism” (Brubaker, 2002),Arctic 发表于 2025-3-25 21:59:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160265/160265_25.pngLegend 发表于 2025-3-26 02:03:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160265/160265_26.pngoverture 发表于 2025-3-26 07:19:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160265/160265_27.pnganaphylaxis 发表于 2025-3-26 08:37:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/17/1603/160265/160265_28.png骨 发表于 2025-3-26 15:52:05
The homological analysis of extended powers,temporary life. These dimensions are fundamental in the production of meaning ambiguity characteristic of social relations in highly differentiated and post-industrial orders. Moreover, as we show below, we also argue that language’s reflexive and indexical dimensions—far from producing consensual a易发怒 发表于 2025-3-26 18:20:21
Karl Heinz Dovermann,Reinhard Schultzure. Considerations about what social relationships actually are, how they form and evolve, and how they connect to wider layers of the social (like culture or networks) remain curiously rare or even absent. Much network research abstracts from the concrete meaning embodied in social relationships,