切掉
发表于 2025-3-26 23:30:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1582/158194/158194_31.png
PLUMP
发表于 2025-3-27 04:29:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1582/158194/158194_32.png
CURL
发表于 2025-3-27 08:03:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1582/158194/158194_33.png
Interstellar
发表于 2025-3-27 12:15:51
Scott’s Shadow: “Proto Territory” in Contemporary Antarctican Antarctica’s past, Glasberg argues that narratives of heroism in Antarctic exploration continue to resonate into the present. Antarctic ice extends an orientalist imaginary not through indigenous populations to be controlled, but rather through scientific categorization of nonhuman species, of neo
Substance-Abuse
发表于 2025-3-27 16:30:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1582/158194/158194_35.png
发生
发表于 2025-3-27 20:23:05
Emerging from the Shadow of Science: Challenges and Opportunities for Antarctic Historyn “what does it mean to write history in a continent for science?” the essay examines some of the challenges and opportunities for historical scholarship in Antarctica. The dominance of the scientific paradigm imposes a number of constraints on historical research, but it also presents historians wi
cochlea
发表于 2025-3-28 00:26:52
Book 2016a for natural scientists working to understand global climate change. As this book shows, the tools of literary studies, history, archaeology, and more, can likewise produce important insights into the nature of the modern world and humanity more broadly..
深渊
发表于 2025-3-28 04:07:45
2730-972X rce of data for natural scientists working to understand global climate change. As this book shows, the tools of literary studies, history, archaeology, and more, can likewise produce important insights into the nature of the modern world and humanity more broadly..978-1-349-71385-1978-1-137-54575-6Series ISSN 2730-972X Series E-ISSN 2730-9738
evince
发表于 2025-3-28 08:51:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1582/158194/158194_39.png
jungle
发表于 2025-3-28 11:44:30
Hans-Ernst Schwiete,Friedrich-Carl Dölboruld mean for our understanding of Antarctica. We also point toward the pedagogical value of deconstructing Antarctica as a continent for science—and the paradox in using the humanities to do so. Finally, the introduction sets out the structure of the book, providing a short overview of the chapters and thematic lines running through them.