蔑视 发表于 2025-3-28 15:45:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0026-8t of spatial knowledge during infancy. The relation between perception and action and mechanisms for the acquisition of concepts from perceptual data are considered in the light of contemporary selectionist approaches to categorisation and cognitive development.debouch 发表于 2025-3-28 19:01:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157934/157934_42.pngHalfhearted 发表于 2025-3-28 23:59:23
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271129 integrate intra-psychological and socio-cultural processes. In this chapter I propose to do two things. First, I shall discuss the mutual construction of asymmetries in various developmental domains. Second, I shall address the question, raised by Valsiner, as to whether asymmetry is compatible with the notion of shared codes in communication.Infraction 发表于 2025-3-29 06:39:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157934/157934_44.pngstress-response 发表于 2025-3-29 09:01:46
Sociocultural Issues in Soviet Psychological Researchaporozhets, Elkonin, Poddiakov, and Venger himself. These are authors whose names are familiar to Western audiences, but their work is not as well known as that of figures such as Vygotsky, Leontiev, and Luria. This lacuna in our knowledge is clearly our loss.Foregery 发表于 2025-3-29 12:07:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157934/157934_46.png分发 发表于 2025-3-29 19:37:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157934/157934_47.png浪费物质 发表于 2025-3-29 21:37:16
Teacher Commitment in Northwest China, In contrast, Michael Boyes finds himself “outside” Vygotskian theory and, therefore, focuses him commentary on a comparison between the work of the Vygotskian school and developmental psychology within the American context.手榴弹 发表于 2025-3-30 00:46:25
Reply to Commentaries In contrast, Michael Boyes finds himself “outside” Vygotskian theory and, therefore, focuses him commentary on a comparison between the work of the Vygotskian school and developmental psychology within the American context.Prognosis 发表于 2025-3-30 05:26:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0026-8 which Gibson’s theory is apt to provide a sufficient basis for understanding conceptual growth. I will first summarize our points of agreement, and then discuss the problems to which our common belief in the perceptual foundations of knowledge lead us.