nostrum
发表于 2025-3-25 03:52:24
,The Construal of Psychoanalysis as a “Practical Hermeneutical Science”,o begin in laying out the nature of the disagreement and the points of dispute. I feel somewhat overwhelmed by the depth of my general disagreement with Lindseth’s point of view and by the sheer multiplicity of specific points of dispute. Let me, however, try to give the reader at least some idea of
OFF
发表于 2025-3-25 09:39:23
Conventions and Interpretation,by breaking new ground and providing new directions. It opens the closure of convention by disclosing new ways of seeing and being. However, the standardization of interpretation in turn conventionalizes it, making the once new routine. I will explore this dialectics of closing and opening, of conve
Lacerate
发表于 2025-3-25 12:57:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157931/157931_23.png
FIN
发表于 2025-3-25 18:05:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157931/157931_24.png
NUL
发表于 2025-3-25 21:44:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157931/157931_25.png
Forehead-Lift
发表于 2025-3-26 04:12:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157931/157931_26.png
entice
发表于 2025-3-26 04:42:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157931/157931_27.png
Sinus-Rhythm
发表于 2025-3-26 12:17:27
Personality Psychology and the Hypothetical-Deductive Model of Explanation,vable causes. In psychology the realm of the mental has generally been thought of as making up the hidden underworld of causes of what people say and do. My aim was to show that this general conception of how psyche is related to our words and deeds is questionable. It was argued that psyche compris
cardiac-arrest
发表于 2025-3-26 15:24:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1580/157931/157931_29.png
Cumbersome
发表于 2025-3-26 18:49:04
,Titchener’s Relativistic View of Observation and Psychological Processes,ters on the subject. This is particularly true of the introspective psychology of Edward Bradford Titchener. The nature of Titchener’s psychology was widely misinterpreted and misconstrued even in his own lifetime and has fared even worse since his death. E. G. Boring (1927) called Titchener’s psych