infelicitous
发表于 2025-3-23 09:58:26
Views on the Moral Status of Animals, other socially widespread views (religions and societal attitudes) and shows what views (those incompatible with the findings of science and those that include incoherent attitudes toward animals) are to be excluded from public justification.
制定
发表于 2025-3-23 14:50:50
Applying Public Justification: Interests, Principles and Competing Reasons,g animals’ interests in life, in freedom and in welfare. The procedure of public justification yields a conclusive outcome only with regard to the principles protecting animals’ interests in welfare, while in the other two families we have inconclusive outcomes. In these cases, we have to employ majoritarian democratic procedures.
本土
发表于 2025-3-23 18:15:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157737/157737_13.png
chassis
发表于 2025-3-23 23:51:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157737/157737_14.png
dilute
发表于 2025-3-24 04:27:19
rinciples acceptable to all. By setting out a unified framework which honours the liberal principles of respect for diversity, a robust liberal political theory capable of dealing with diverse forms of disagreement, and even some forms of radical dissent, is achieved..978-3-030-49511-4978-3-030-49509-1
吃掉
发表于 2025-3-24 10:11:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157737/157737_16.png
设施
发表于 2025-3-24 14:33:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157737/157737_17.png
Free-Radical
发表于 2025-3-24 17:51:40
Animal Treatment as a Matter of Reasonable Disagreement,ssible in practice, two paradigmatic cases of peer disagreement are discussed: the first regarding the admissibility of the use of animals in research laboratories and the second regarding the problem of weighing animal suffering. The purchase of this idea is that our best available arguments and ev
botany
发表于 2025-3-24 21:28:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157737/157737_19.png
arboretum
发表于 2025-3-24 23:47:36
Views on the Moral Status of Animals,thocentrism, Relationalism, Environmentalism and Humanism. The rest of the chapter explains why these views are sufficient to partially represent some other socially widespread views (religions and societal attitudes) and shows what views (those incompatible with the findings of science and those th