certain 发表于 2025-3-25 06:53:06
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilbere possibility and acquisition of knowledge of such consciousness will be reinterpreted and found to be problems concerning something of quite a different nature, that is, problems concerning language and the description of animal mentality.ALERT 发表于 2025-3-25 10:19:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157735/157735_22.pngvocation 发表于 2025-3-25 14:08:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157735/157735_23.png帽子 发表于 2025-3-25 16:22:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157735/157735_24.pnginitiate 发表于 2025-3-25 22:25:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157735/157735_25.pngdecode 发表于 2025-3-26 03:50:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157735/157735_26.pngALLEY 发表于 2025-3-26 04:48:07
Anthropomorphous Animals and Philosophy,oblems, including the fact that such studies are limited in their ability to provide a picture of a phenomenological world that is truly representative of the lived experiences of nonhumans and of their amazing capacities (some of which are different from—and some of which are like—the abilities of human beings).FUME 发表于 2025-3-26 09:52:40
Book 2023sectionality in relation to animal ethics been more important. In particular, the arguments related to anthropomorphic attributes of mentality to other than humans promise to provide fruitful new ground for re-assessing human-animal relations. This book maps the central debates surrounding anthropomWater-Brash 发表于 2025-3-26 13:48:09
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberural sciences constitute the world based on presuppositions that it assumes are value-neutral and transparent, but that (in relation to some of these presuppositions with regard to animals) distort ‘reality’.同音 发表于 2025-3-26 20:10:05
Critical Anthropomorphism,ural sciences constitute the world based on presuppositions that it assumes are value-neutral and transparent, but that (in relation to some of these presuppositions with regard to animals) distort ‘reality’.