聪明
发表于 2025-3-23 11:54:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157734/157734_11.png
Mutter
发表于 2025-3-23 17:02:58
,What’s Good for the Goose Should Also be Good for the Gander,ralism at certain points in time. They reveal much more about a particular theorist’s personal bias than they do about liberalism as a political framework. Liberal principles have been successfully deployed for the benefit of so many marginal others; others with whom the ruling class did not wish to
垄断
发表于 2025-3-23 19:29:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157734/157734_13.png
optional
发表于 2025-3-23 23:09:38
Introduction,cab-horse, declares ‘My doctrine is this, that if we see cruelty or wrong that we have the power to stop, and do nothing, we make ourselves sharers in the guilt’.. I believe that most people would echo those sentiments and step in to stop cruelty to an animal if they were to see it. I don’t detect s
acrobat
发表于 2025-3-24 04:26:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157734/157734_15.png
儿童
发表于 2025-3-24 10:15:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157734/157734_16.png
蒙太奇
发表于 2025-3-24 13:19:43
Animal Visibility,, prompted by the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic, distressing and distasteful. However, as he rightly points out, the big difference between what occurred in that case and what happens to animals every other day is that foot-and-mouth disease generated wide media interest. So, on that particul
Spinal-Tap
发表于 2025-3-24 18:16:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157734/157734_18.png
立即
发表于 2025-3-24 20:15:26
,What’s Good for the Goose Should Also be Good for the Gander, the ‘humanitarians’ had the last laugh. I share his optimism. I am highly suspicious of claims that liberalism is an inherently anti-animal framework or that we must look to an entirely new political paradigm to comprehensively protect the interests of animals. Robert Garner may be correct when he
Hiatal-Hernia
发表于 2025-3-24 23:10:54
Conclusion,reated in 1822 and have remained biased to the present day. I have termed this type of bias ‘the internal inconsistency’. It is internal because it tells us nothing about how we manage animals compared to humans. It only exposes problems with the way we treat animals in comparison to other animals.