鞭子
发表于 2025-3-23 12:17:07
Adeline-Cristina Cozma,Monica Violeta Achimy participative beings with agency and subjectivity. Historians usually seem reluctant to give animals agency and subjectivity. This reluctance, I argue, is linked to ideas about history as a discipline and related conceptual frameworks (such as agency). To interrogate these aspects, this chapter lo
伙伴
发表于 2025-3-23 15:52:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34082-6nimals involved in them. Through the lens of the animals involved in the case, we examine cases in which animal interests were considered by human advocates and decided by human judges. We begin by providing a rudimentary methodological framework for how legal scholars and commentators might expand
CAJ
发表于 2025-3-23 18:52:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157717/157717_13.png
certain
发表于 2025-3-23 23:25:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157717/157717_14.png
Contracture
发表于 2025-3-24 03:59:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157717/157717_15.png
文字
发表于 2025-3-24 08:15:07
Michael J. Glover,Les MitchellExplores the concept of animals as experiencing entities.Offers narrative accounts of specific animals to explore their historical experiences.Theoretically engages animal subjectivity
指数
发表于 2025-3-24 11:25:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157717/157717_17.png
languid
发表于 2025-3-24 15:03:21
,Introduction: Animals ‘caught with ourselves in the net of life and time’,isciplines have explored animals’ capacities for felt, subjective states and that historians and theorists can draw on such research to validate animals’ experiences in their own research. It also provides an overview of the chapters contained in this volume.
确认
发表于 2025-3-24 21:42:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1578/157717/157717_19.png
Texture
发表于 2025-3-25 01:25:32
Critical Animal Historiography, Experiential Subjectivity and Animal Standpoint Theoryter constitutes a critical contribution to the work done by Steven Best, Richard Kahn, Anthony Nocella II, and others. Rejecting relativism, it is critical of some of the epistemological commitments of critical animal studies while endorsing the normative conclusions drawn by these authors.