Myofibrils
发表于 2025-3-28 18:13:10
Friendship, Enmity, and Fear (Albert the Great, ,, Book 8, Questions 1–3)easurable. However, the question is whether an emotional reaction to or qualification of an object (e.g. as pleasurable) surpasses the level of the sensory soul and thus goes beyond the mental abilities of nonhuman animals. This is one of the fundamental questions Albert tries to answer.
Chronic
发表于 2025-3-28 20:20:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1577/157613/157613_42.png
古董
发表于 2025-3-29 02:42:10
Reasoning and Thinking (Roger Bacon, ,, Part II, Distinction 3, Chapter 9) in the same way in which humans are. What they can do by virtue of this power is to perform basic inferences in order to structure and plan certain activities. Given Bacon’s own examples and descriptions one could say that he presents a medieval version of modern accounts of nonlinguistic thinking.
Banquet
发表于 2025-3-29 04:31:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1577/157613/157613_44.png
Nibble
发表于 2025-3-29 07:35:31
The Centralised System of Managementotably, a sense called ‘estimation’ or ‘estimative power’. By this power, a sheep, for example, perceives features such as the harmfulness of a wolf. Even though this example is embedded in a relatively technical text containing a great deal of physiological terminology, it rapidly became the prime example in Latin discussions of animal minds.
Ballad
发表于 2025-3-29 12:31:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1577/157613/157613_46.png
恶心
发表于 2025-3-29 16:47:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1577/157613/157613_47.png
GEON
发表于 2025-3-29 22:11:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1577/157613/157613_48.png
FAR
发表于 2025-3-30 00:56:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1577/157613/157613_49.png
厨师
发表于 2025-3-30 05:04:18
Hans-Martin Niemeier,Peter Forsythepending on the appetite to which they belong. Enjoyment, for instance, is brought about by the concupiscible appetite. Hope and despair are irascible emotions. Thus, the answers he gives to the question of whether nonhuman animals have emotions are based on this fundamental psychological distinction.