lethal
发表于 2025-3-23 12:31:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1575/157471/157471_11.png
沙文主义
发表于 2025-3-23 15:16:07
Social Interaction of Anglo-Indians Within and Outside the Community,i about where the train was headed. He could not utter a word though he understood what the man said. He took this to be a learning experience, and later he started to talk to his fellow passengers in Bengali so that his vocabulary in the language would improve. Now he is confident that if such an i
brassy
发表于 2025-3-23 18:12:28
Social Organizations and Social Securities in the Anglo-Indian Community,een as organized in its endeavour to do something to maintain its identity. This has given the community greater resilience in the face of adverse pressures. The history of Anglo-Indian organizations shows, however, that their self-image as ‘Westernised’ has not kept pace with the times. Indeed, one
heterodox
发表于 2025-3-24 00:46:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1575/157471/157471_14.png
合同
发表于 2025-3-24 05:38:33
Book 2017ce, class and gender discrimination intersect in the lives and experiences of Anglo-Indian women, this work provides insights into contemporary gender relations in India, and is a key read for scholars in gender and sociology, as well as minority and diaspora studies..
wangle
发表于 2025-3-24 10:02:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1575/157471/157471_16.png
入会
发表于 2025-3-24 11:12:26
Introduction,e forged, this distinct identity of being an Anglo-Indian congealed and persisted. This process was further aided by the frequently partisan attitude of the colonial administration towards the community. The Anglo-Indian community grew rapidly in numbers, wealth and power in the early nineteenth cen
LAITY
发表于 2025-3-24 16:42:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1575/157471/157471_18.png
Graphite
发表于 2025-3-24 21:29:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1575/157471/157471_19.png
TOXIC
发表于 2025-3-25 01:04:58
Family, Marriage and Kinship in the Anglo-Indian Community,dary line between ‘we’ and ‘the’ was still maintained, forcing the community to stay within communitarian confines. This should not suggest that the community had set the boundary single-handedly. It was more of a two-way process, in which both the minority and the majority communities (non–Anglo-In