庇护
发表于 2025-3-23 13:11:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1569/156848/156848_11.png
中子
发表于 2025-3-23 14:51:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4957-4Hangul is presented. All these models involve sequential and quasi-sequential orthography–phonology–morphology construal for reading, which is different from that for spelling. A model for spelling needs to be developed as empirical evidence accumulates in the interaction between the Korean language
跟随
发表于 2025-3-23 21:10:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1569/156848/156848_13.png
隐语
发表于 2025-3-24 02:00:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1569/156848/156848_14.png
Presbyopia
发表于 2025-3-24 04:43:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1569/156848/156848_15.png
一条卷发
发表于 2025-3-24 10:06:55
Pathway to the Korean Alphabetrea and moves on to how Chinese characters were not suitable as a writing system for Koreans to such a degree that they could not encode the Korean language properly. The birth of the Korean alphabet was possible due to King Sejong’s sympathy for ordinary people’s challenges with their illiteracy (a
INERT
发表于 2025-3-24 13:54:09
Beyond the Invention: Trajectory, Modern Use, and Global Affordancesthe Korean alphabet after its birth. As opposed to King Sejong’s vision, the writing system was not welcomed by ruling elites in the fifteenth century and onward, who viewed Chinese characters as .. It surveys the sociocultural context of the JoSeon dynasty and the alphabet usage primarily by ordina
Contracture
发表于 2025-3-24 17:19:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1569/156848/156848_18.png
annexation
发表于 2025-3-24 22:18:51
Orthographic and Phonological Representations in HangulKorean alphabet in the fifteenth century, King Sejong not only implemented cosmological concepts (the trinity of the universe—the heavens, earth, and humankind) into the design of vowels (.) and the articulatory organs into consonants (.or .), but also employed systematic stroke-addition rules to ex
周兴旺
发表于 2025-3-24 23:42:16
From the Phonemic Principle to the Morphophonological Principleh century, grapheme–phoneme correspondences were regular and consistent with near-perfect fidelity, which promoted scriptal learnability. While spoken language had gradually changed from the fifteenth century through the nineteenth century, however, the phonographic script could not keep abreast wit