libertine
发表于 2025-3-30 09:14:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93378-8paper will deal with the views of certain contemporary philosophers on proper names. Since the contemporary discussion is mainly confined to the description theory and the causal theory of proper names, I would like to discuss in this context the views of Frege, Russell, and Kripke. The second secti
aristocracy
发表于 2025-3-30 13:17:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156649/156649_52.png
龙虾
发表于 2025-3-30 16:34:54
Displacement Among Sri Lankan Tamil MigrantsThere is overwhelming evidence that proper names must have senses or connotations that somehow contain contingent information about their referents. There is also overwhelming evidence that proper names cannot possibly have such senses or connotations. That is the paradox of naming.
insurrection
发表于 2025-3-31 00:21:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156649/156649_54.png
不可接触
发表于 2025-3-31 01:26:22
Introduction: Here and Elsewhere,In this article, I shall focus on the four terms of the title. The implications of the present remarks will be argued elsewhere.
Frisky
发表于 2025-3-31 07:37:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1567/156649/156649_56.png
树木中
发表于 2025-3-31 12:50:11
The Paradox of Naming,There is overwhelming evidence that proper names must have senses or connotations that somehow contain contingent information about their referents. There is also overwhelming evidence that proper names cannot possibly have such senses or connotations. That is the paradox of naming.