接合
发表于 2025-3-23 10:20:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_11.png
dandruff
发表于 2025-3-23 15:53:46
Empiricism,rgued for here. This theory provides a straightforward argument for the IMH. Unfortunately from our point of view, the theory is mistaken. Consequently, we must find another argument for the IMH. On the other hand, in seeing what is wrong with the theory we put ourselves in a better position to argue for the ATH.
发怨言
发表于 2025-3-23 21:24:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_13.png
CULP
发表于 2025-3-24 01:43:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_14.png
conflate
发表于 2025-3-24 06:04:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_15.png
GRAIN
发表于 2025-3-24 08:04:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_16.png
CRAFT
发表于 2025-3-24 13:32:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_17.png
SENT
发表于 2025-3-24 17:04:03
Authenticity,ing form. Let us say that a copy is a correct copy of an original painting if the two share exactly the same pictorial properties. Then the hypothesis is that any correct copy of the original is an instance of the work that the original is an instance of.
ingestion
发表于 2025-3-24 20:07:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_19.png
Blasphemy
发表于 2025-3-25 02:05:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1557/155669/155669_20.png