抛媚眼
发表于 2025-3-23 13:43:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155583/155583_11.png
Onerous
发表于 2025-3-23 15:15:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155583/155583_12.png
谁在削木头
发表于 2025-3-23 19:26:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155583/155583_13.png
Optimum
发表于 2025-3-23 23:13:58
Freedom and Science, His case turned on the claim that he had, unknowingly, been exposed to chemicals at work that had rendered him liable to extremely violent behaviour. The question at the centre of the case was then: what connection, if any, was there between the fact that he was exposed to this chemical and his violent behaviour?
corpus-callosum
发表于 2025-3-24 06:01:04
Mind and Behaviour,as important — some would say very much more important — than the similarities. We can, perhaps, best approach these modern developments by distinguishing a number of different strands in the Cartesian account.
倔强不能
发表于 2025-3-24 09:37:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155583/155583_16.png
一个姐姐
发表于 2025-3-24 12:43:10
Book 2001e rejecting the dualist approach associated in particular with Descartes, it also casts serious doubt on the forms of materialism that now dominate English language philosophy. Drawing in particular on the work of Wittgenstein, a central place is given to the importance of the notion of a human bein
–DOX
发表于 2025-3-24 16:30:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155583/155583_18.png
Deadpan
发表于 2025-3-24 19:05:41
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509108bibliography; drawing; English; English language; freedom; identity; knowledge; language; liberty; Ludwig Wit
秘传
发表于 2025-3-25 01:36:57
978-0-333-96122-3Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001