调色板
发表于 2025-3-25 04:27:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20954-3ominally, as the title suggests, an attack on empiricism. The ‘two dogmas’ which the paper attacks are, first, reductionism: ‘the belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to some logical construction upon terms which refer to immediate experience’;2 and, secondly the belief that there is
单色
发表于 2025-3-25 11:34:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155582/155582_22.png
河流
发表于 2025-3-25 15:05:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155582/155582_23.png
使声音降低
发表于 2025-3-25 16:41:39
Die elliptischen Funktionen von Jacobin terms of the beliefs and intentions of speakers and hearers in specific, concrete contexts of communication. I am not so sure about this. I think the options need to be, and can be, set up rather differently. The outlines of the revision I have in mind are perhaps already darkly visible, and will,
Self-Help-Group
发表于 2025-3-25 20:30:21
Die elliptischen Funktionen von Jacobi role in the analysis to the concept of a . ., or a rule of language. And it can seem a great relief, as it does also to Davidson, to be rid of the debased coinage which such phrases have often seemed over the past thirty years to have become.
avulsion
发表于 2025-3-26 03:43:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155582/155582_26.png
来自于
发表于 2025-3-26 07:41:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155582/155582_27.png
预知
发表于 2025-3-26 09:45:13
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/155582.jpg
裂隙
发表于 2025-3-26 16:10:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20954-3re Quine speaks of ‘two cardinal tenets of empiricism’ as remaining ‘unassailable… to this day’.3 The two cardinal tenets, as distinct from the two dogmas, are (1) that ‘whatever evidence there . for science . sensory evidence’,4 and (2) that ‘all inculcation of meanings of words must rest ultimately on sensory evidence’.5
Pde5-Inhibitors
发表于 2025-3-26 20:46:23
Vermischte geometrische Anwendungens makes it pointless. Similar arguments, as we have seen, defeat the programme of phenomenalist analysis characteristic of Vienna Circle positivism and Carnap’s .. And Quine’s strictures against quantifying into modal contexts raise reverse difficulties for any conception of analysis founded upon modal logic and the notion of a possible world.