猛烈抨击
发表于 2025-3-21 17:47:59
书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>书目名称An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0155556<br><br> <br><br>
古老
发表于 2025-3-21 22:30:56
cts distrusted them, partly because they often disregarded details of importance in actual construction, partly because nobody but a mathematician could understand the aim and func tion of a mathematical theory designed to represent an aspect of nature. This book is the first to show how statics, strength of978-1-4612-7751-4978-1-4612-2994-0
使闭塞
发表于 2025-3-22 03:42:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155556/155556_3.png
彩色的蜡笔
发表于 2025-3-22 05:29:47
An Introduction to the History of Structural MechanicsPart II: Vaulted Str
Pamphlet
发表于 2025-3-22 11:42:30
An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics978-1-4612-2994-0
固执点好
发表于 2025-3-22 16:12:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155556/155556_6.png
不来
发表于 2025-3-22 18:18:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155556/155556_7.png
首创精神
发表于 2025-3-22 22:16:29
Architectonic Debatesf domes and vaults. Why, then, should anyone question experience? The old models were graceful, harmonic, based on proportions which combined beauty and strength. Everyone firmly believed that the arch was the most stable of architectural figures; what needed refinement were the technical methods—sc
lymphoma
发表于 2025-3-23 04:28:24
Later Researchn scientists who sometimes seem to be toying with it, using it to show off their mathematical erudition. It is difficult to make one’s way through the tangle of formalism, tortuous reasoning, and elegant demonstrations to the underlying hypotheses—some of them most significant—of writers like Bossut
choleretic
发表于 2025-3-23 07:47:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1556/155556/155556_10.png