生命层
发表于 2025-3-27 00:04:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1554/155373/155373_31.png
野蛮
发表于 2025-3-27 04:42:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1554/155373/155373_32.png
会议
发表于 2025-3-27 08:13:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1554/155373/155373_33.png
他很灵活
发表于 2025-3-27 11:34:36
erkegaard, Marx, Nietzsche, Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Habermas, Foucault, and the ‘Events‘ of 1968. Written for English-speaking readers, it describes the varied traditions within 19th and 20th century European philosophy, reflecting the dynamism and plurality within the Europe
无所不知
发表于 2025-3-27 14:45:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1554/155373/155373_35.png
施舍
发表于 2025-3-27 21:15:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1554/155373/155373_36.png
大漩涡
发表于 2025-3-28 00:00:31
Reflections on the Present Conflict,an philosophy and Anglo-Saxon thought are supposed to be two opposing — and maybe irreconcilable — camps, and the authors of a book such as this cannot do to forget such circumstances. Whether one likes it or not, one is involved in the polemic.
commensurate
发表于 2025-3-28 03:49:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1554/155373/155373_38.png
Modify
发表于 2025-3-28 09:19:01
ne school of thought. It has been purged of jargon but contains a glossary of important technical terms. There is a bibliography of further reading, suitable for students, at the end of each chapter.978-1-349-24232-0
TOXIC
发表于 2025-3-28 11:23:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9663-6by later existentialists, but which has made him a central figure for subsequent Christian thought. Kierkegaard himself most often likened his position to that of a Christian Socrates, an heroically individual thinker faced with the struggle of faith.