不满分子
发表于 2025-3-28 16:29:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1550/154939/154939_41.png
反应
发表于 2025-3-28 19:40:48
Rolf G. Heinze,Karl Hinrichs,Thomas Olkfundamental to the development of this field. Histories of financial crises traditionally address questions about individual incidents. Enquiry into the Great Depression has proved especially popular. This chapter explains how the traditional approach is now complemented by studies applying economet
antidote
发表于 2025-3-29 01:39:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1550/154939/154939_43.png
Neutral-Spine
发表于 2025-3-29 05:38:13
,Der Aufstand der Tzeltal (1712–1713),ng standards, wellbeing, and economic development. Historical evidence can be especially valuable to understanding how human and health capital is formed, and how it contributes to development. Issues discussed in this chapter include water, sanitation and hygiene, maternal and child health, and cli
Crepitus
发表于 2025-3-29 09:16:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1550/154939/154939_45.png
palliative-care
发表于 2025-3-29 13:29:16
https://doi.org/10.57088/978-3-7329-9151-8ocieties. Understanding the processes leading to their decline, and the associated improvements in living standards and life expectancy, is a precondition for knowing what is needed to prevent their re-emergence. This chapter provides a historical perspective on famine and disease to help overcome t
恶名声
发表于 2025-3-29 18:05:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1550/154939/154939_47.png
没有准备
发表于 2025-3-29 21:16:05
An Economist’s Guide to Economic History978-3-319-96568-0Series ISSN 2662-6497 Series E-ISSN 2662-6500
Compass
发表于 2025-3-30 01:12:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81016-8ce. Part of its motivation lies in the paradox that economic historians are perceived to be an endangered species at the exact moment there is newfound demand for their services. The other is the active economic history scene that is populated by researchers with diverse academic backgrounds, exemplified by the contributors to this book.
胆小懦夫
发表于 2025-3-30 05:14:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81016-8ridges these two disciplines by discussing archetypical approaches and research strategies in each. The authors contrast the differences between deductive, inductive and abductive reasoning in scholarly enquiry. They conclude with a call for consideration to (historical) context when conducting research in economics and economic history.