jaundiced 发表于 2025-3-23 13:06:12

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1546/154582/154582_11.png

字的误用 发表于 2025-3-23 16:09:54

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1546/154582/154582_12.png

条约 发表于 2025-3-23 18:38:03

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1546/154582/154582_13.png

Vldl379 发表于 2025-3-24 01:02:51

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20241-7ion in the 1950s? What can these stories tell us about the adoption and domestication of new technologies today and their importance in understanding the role and kind of religion in the public sphere?

CRUC 发表于 2025-3-24 04:44:15

Protestants and the Television: The Paradox Reassessed,ion in the 1950s? What can these stories tell us about the adoption and domestication of new technologies today and their importance in understanding the role and kind of religion in the public sphere?

收到 发表于 2025-3-24 07:20:35

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1546/154582/154582_16.png

Radiculopathy 发表于 2025-3-24 13:44:28

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91897-1ded to provide an interface between evangelicals, the television networks, and the Federal Communications Commission—was formed in direct response and as a counterpart to the BFC, just as the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE, founded 1941) was formed as a direct response to the National Council of Churches.

盘旋 发表于 2025-3-24 15:37:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1546/154582/154582_18.png

老巫婆 发表于 2025-3-24 22:59:57

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1546/154582/154582_19.png

Anthem 发表于 2025-3-25 01:46:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1546/154582/154582_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: American Protestants and TV in the 1950s; Responses to a New M Michele Rosenthal Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America