愚蠢人
发表于 2025-3-25 07:18:38
,Ersatzbeschaffungen und Zugänge,rs have tried to mitigate them (Part II) to focusing on potential remedies or reforms that can be adopted to address them. To this end, the first chapter in this section, Chapter 9 (“Nothing Human Can Be Perfect: Constitutional Change and the Limits of the Remedies Thereafter”), begins by noting tha
过份
发表于 2025-3-25 07:48:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154491/154491_22.png
MARS
发表于 2025-3-25 12:37:09
Dividendenpolitik und Kapitalbeschaffung, from advocate of reform via constitutional means (Article V) to advocate for reform via extra-constitutional means (parties, judicial interpretation, statute, leadership, etc.). Whereas the last chapter focused on “the . and . of constitutional reform: Who throughout American history has called for
明确
发表于 2025-3-25 17:07:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-94482-6tinued)”) continues where the previous chapter left off focusing on the “.” of constitutional reform. Given the difficulty of amending the Constitution via the two Article V routes provided by the Framers, this chapter focuses on extra-constitutional means of changing the structure of government, in
Control-Group
发表于 2025-3-25 23:37:53
Jeanne SheehanLooks past partisan politics to explain voter frustration and anger at the American system.Explains why we are in this situation, why the government is unable to respond to key challenges, and what we
ALTER
发表于 2025-3-26 02:07:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154491/154491_26.png
monogamy
发表于 2025-3-26 04:43:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62281-7US Politics; Polarization; Madison; Madisonian System; constitutional system; Separation of powers; Madiso
Antagonist
发表于 2025-3-26 09:19:01
978-3-030-62283-1The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
残忍
发表于 2025-3-26 12:48:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154491/154491_29.png
obligation
发表于 2025-3-26 17:50:51
A Republic—If You Can Keep It: Choice II adopt. The Framers were committed to creating a democratic state in which the people were sovereign. At the time, the type of democracy familiar to most people was the pure/direct variety that had been used in and by the Greek city-states. Fewer people were familiar with the alternative, a republic