aristocracy
发表于 2025-3-23 11:35:09
Postscript: Democracyngman rule or party tyranny, virtually everyone with a claim to leadership seeks to legitimate that claim in democracy’s name. It is probably impossible to eliminate ambiguity and even contradiction in these multifold usages, for they may well be built into the very concept; the moment we say someth
情感
发表于 2025-3-23 16:21:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154490/154490_12.png
朝圣者
发表于 2025-3-23 21:29:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154490/154490_13.png
宇宙你
发表于 2025-3-24 00:16:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154490/154490_14.png
arsenal
发表于 2025-3-24 04:40:51
Ergebnisse der exakten Naturwissenschafteneties. In that sense, antistate ideology, or just simple cynicism about the state, has come willy-nilly to take on a partially democratic character, not just in the United States but even in some of the more (overtly) statist European societies as well. “Populist antistatism” focuses our attention,
Acetaminophen
发表于 2025-3-24 06:46:41
Springer Tracts in Modern Physicsseful goods than any other person has been more freely propagated, and more respectfully received, than ever before. Yet except in the one restrictive context of American race relations, the literature of equality seems barely to have made contact with political and social possibility in the late tw
Intrepid
发表于 2025-3-24 13:51:08
Die Fett verarbeitenden Industrienmericans, Republicans and Democrats, he had now become convinced that we were divided into Americans and liberals. Just a few short years after that neofascist invocation, Mike Dukakis fled from the “L word” as though he had been accused of card-carrying Communism; and now Bill Clinton is doing the
拍翅
发表于 2025-3-24 16:44:27
Jodierte, bromierte und nitrierte Fette,ble, “democracy” is about the authorship of collective decisions. People who are subject to laws are to be treated as if they willingly subjected themselves to such laws—to endorse their own personhood and to firmly ground a sense of collective agency. This ideal notion of authorship is of course no
conjunctivitis
发表于 2025-3-24 20:49:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154490/154490_19.png
整洁漂亮
发表于 2025-3-25 02:03:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91377-8f unremitting and inexplicable violence. This strange inversion of meaning and feeling is not the doing of the Coen Brothers (who may or may not have read Yeats in their college days) but of best-selling author Cormac McCarthy, who adapted Yeats’s line (without citation) for his own version of porte