predict
发表于 2025-3-23 11:23:24
w the growth of presidential power accompanied administrativ.This volume proposes a capacity-centered approach for understanding American bureaucracy. The administrative institutions that made the country a superpower turned out to be fragile under Donald Trump’s presidency. Laboring beneath systema
世俗
发表于 2025-3-23 17:51:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154468/154468_12.png
amenity
发表于 2025-3-23 19:00:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4377-4 this chapter, we develop our framework further by explaining capacity’s movement within the dynamics of administrative reform. We describe how the literature of American political development provides insights in understanding the coevolutionary dynamics of presidential dominance and capacity decay.
宣誓书
发表于 2025-3-24 01:49:05
The Concept of Capacity,ring them in the knowledge of American political development let us arrive at a definition that captures the complex challenges of modern administration. In this chapter‘s theoretical foray, the core dimensions of capacity and resilience as the goal of capacity building are identified and set against the backdrop of political change.
oracle
发表于 2025-3-24 02:40:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154468/154468_15.png
breadth
发表于 2025-3-24 08:58:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154468/154468_16.png
Mendicant
发表于 2025-3-24 13:51:35
Traditional Approaches to Controlling Administrative Capacity,ion, later reforms embraced the concept of a nonpartisan bureaucracy that helped build capacity. However, such capacity building also possessed political undertones and set the stage for late twentieth-century reforms that helped influence the decay and decline of administrative capacity recently witnessed.
arrogant
发表于 2025-3-24 15:09:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154468/154468_18.png
commune
发表于 2025-3-24 20:56:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154468/154468_19.png
思想上升
发表于 2025-3-25 00:08:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154468/154468_20.png