冬眠 发表于 2025-3-23 12:11:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154441/154441_11.pngdaredevil 发表于 2025-3-23 15:46:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154441/154441_12.pngNuance 发表于 2025-3-23 19:00:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154441/154441_13.pngPerigee 发表于 2025-3-23 22:55:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154441/154441_14.pngGranular 发表于 2025-3-24 04:21:12
I Stand by This Man: Colbert Speaks Truthiness to Power,sh presidency. Colbert, in character as a Bill O’Reilly-esque conservative pundit, made satire history as he delivered a highly nuanced, extremely detailed critique of the president and the media that covered him while both the president and the media were in the room. When Colbert delivered his spe自传 发表于 2025-3-24 09:22:47
The Public at Risk: Dissent and Democracy after 9/11, and democratic deliberation in the United States were already under threat prior to the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Well before that day, a series of ideological turns—among them the postmodern crisis of the left, the rise in right-wing fundamentalism, and the cult of individualism fostered by extre涂掉 发表于 2025-3-24 14:03:41
Proud to Be an American Satirist,y was un-American, those familiar with U.S. history know well that political comedy—especially satire—has a long tradition in this country.1 Beginning with the founding fathers, satire and fake news were used to encourage the public to support the goals of the Revolution. Colin Wells writes that dur凹处 发表于 2025-3-24 17:31:25
America According to ,: Or How a TV Show Can Change the Way a Nation Thinks,” This statement gets at the heart of a central feature of political satire. Is it serious or not? Is it just entertainment, silliness, and mockery? Does it engage in negative critique, leaving the audience cynical and disaffected? Or is it a politically powerful way to change how people think? As I事与愿违 发表于 2025-3-24 21:26:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154441/154441_19.png争议的苹果 发表于 2025-3-24 23:35:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1545/154441/154441_20.png