泥土谦卑 发表于 2025-3-26 23:28:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1535/153415/153415_31.pngentitle 发表于 2025-3-27 02:46:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1535/153415/153415_32.pngharmony 发表于 2025-3-27 08:14:24
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57758-0r not exaggerating our abilities or importance. Finally, it suggests that the relationship between such humility, “eschatological trust” and hope sheds new light on how best to understand Kierkegaard’s claim that awareness of a “way out” must be present if a use of the comic is to be ethically “legi下垂 发表于 2025-3-27 09:37:44
Death At The Gate: Who Let Him In?nce. In the second section, I do the same with comedy by drawing parallels between Nietzsche’s later philosophy and the Dionysian comedies of Aristophanes. In so doing, I show how laughter and comedy are central to Nietzsche’s life-affirming ethics and his project of self-creation, but I also note thandle 发表于 2025-3-27 13:52:18
Death At The Gate: Who Let Him In?etaphysical exposition of the . in . and by the account of fabulation that Bergson only elaborates fully three decades later in .. The more substantive account of the . ultimately shows that, in ., Bergson misses his own point: laughter does not simply serve as a means for correcting human behaviorCanvas 发表于 2025-3-27 18:19:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1535/153415/153415_36.pngDetain 发表于 2025-3-27 23:52:33
,Jean Paul’s Lunacy, or Humor as Trans-Critique,claim that literature represents “the only second world” (i.e. the world of the resurrection) “in the first one.” Unlike Friedrich Schiller and the Jena Romantics, Jean Paul’s version of “aesthetic education” grounds the authority of literature on its ability not to synthesize polar opposites, but t兵团 发表于 2025-3-28 05:26:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1535/153415/153415_38.pngCarcinogen 发表于 2025-3-28 10:05:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1535/153415/153415_39.pngMOTIF 发表于 2025-3-28 11:16:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1535/153415/153415_40.png