graphic
发表于 2025-3-21 16:16:12
书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0152384<br><br> <br><br>
小教堂
发表于 2025-3-21 21:05:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1524/152384/152384_2.png
星星
发表于 2025-3-22 03:53:08
Logical Consequence,ing fact about the literature is that pretty much nobody has bothered to follow up the article’s many references to Carnap’s . in any detail—this despite the fact that the only conception of consequence Tarski mentions is Carnap’s. I will argue that the article intends nothing more than an improveme
achlorhydria
发表于 2025-3-22 05:47:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1524/152384/152384_4.png
基因组
发表于 2025-3-22 10:36:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9247-6he older meaning-theoretic notions he had acquired from Kotarbiński and Leśniewski. Padoa’s method clearly should be construed in semantic terms, yet in 1934 Tarski is willing to re-use material from 1926 in which the notion of an interpretation of a term receives the same psychologistic treatment i
CLIFF
发表于 2025-3-22 15:46:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9247-6ing fact about the literature is that pretty much nobody has bothered to follow up the article’s many references to Carnap’s . in any detail—this despite the fact that the only conception of consequence Tarski mentions is Carnap’s. I will argue that the article intends nothing more than an improveme
侵略主义
发表于 2025-3-22 19:22:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1524/152384/152384_7.png
acrobat
发表于 2025-3-22 21:18:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1524/152384/152384_8.png
都相信我的话
发表于 2025-3-23 04:33:27
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367227logic; philosophy; philosophy of language; semantics
整洁
发表于 2025-3-23 08:27:36
978-1-349-30673-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012