Infelicity 发表于 2025-3-26 22:41:42

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13657-6justify this assumption. That is to say, we need to show that our lives really would be impoverished if we were to replace all or most of our beliefs by mere pragmatic acceptances. This will prove to be a subtler and more difficult task than might be expected.

alabaster 发表于 2025-3-27 04:57:22

Cognitive Contingency,ny of the radical alternatives suggested in the previous chapter, since they require massive adjustment at all levels. However, the possibility remains that a creature with a different cognitive constitution could find such an alternative system more congenial than the standard version. We have alre

Regurgitation 发表于 2025-3-27 05:34:32

Pragmatism and the Value of Truth,justify this assumption. That is to say, we need to show that our lives really would be impoverished if we were to replace all or most of our beliefs by mere pragmatic acceptances. This will prove to be a subtler and more difficult task than might be expected.

信条 发表于 2025-3-27 10:50:45

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1518/151757/151757_34.png

Irremediable 发表于 2025-3-27 15:59:12

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1518/151757/151757_35.png

开头 发表于 2025-3-27 21:04:39

,Scepticism — and How Not to Avoid It,ified in believing anything empirical if belief is understood to aim at truth in a strong extensional sense; but claim also that the situation can be rectified if the concept of belief is modified in a certain way. However, before examining the ways in which our ordinary concepts can be modified, we

发源 发表于 2025-3-28 00:20:05

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1518/151757/151757_37.png

符合你规定 发表于 2025-3-28 04:02:04

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1518/151757/151757_38.png

podiatrist 发表于 2025-3-28 07:56:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1518/151757/151757_39.png

Forehead-Lift 发表于 2025-3-28 13:26:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1518/151757/151757_40.png
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Aiming at Truth; Nicholas Unwin Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2007 argue.knowledge.scepticism