并排上下 发表于 2025-3-26 23:00:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1517/151700/151700_31.png圣人 发表于 2025-3-27 01:26:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1517/151700/151700_32.pngFUME 发表于 2025-3-27 06:01:21
Domain B: Knowledge and Cultureations. Knowledge and power are intimately linked; the questions of ‘what knowledge’ and ‘whose knowledge’ is valued are vitally important. We review the informal (outside of institutions) and formal knowledge processes that have been found to support agroecology. These affirm and enable the knowledinquisitive 发表于 2025-3-27 12:16:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1517/151700/151700_34.pngpredict 发表于 2025-3-27 15:28:42
Domain D: Networkse, coordinated actions needed for agroecological transformation at different scales. Civil society-driven networks are crucial because they facilitate a kind of cooperation that cannot be generated by the market or the state. On the other hand, the absence of appropriate networks can substantially lFinasteride 发表于 2025-3-27 19:07:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1517/151700/151700_36.pngAnalogy 发表于 2025-3-27 22:48:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1517/151700/151700_37.pngFUSE 发表于 2025-3-28 05:43:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1517/151700/151700_38.png抑制 发表于 2025-3-28 09:45:37
Reflexive Participatory Governance for Agroecological Transformations discuss governance and facilitation mechanisms that enable continuous discussions, negotiations, exchange and joint planning between actors. Further, we provide guidance on this ongoing and iterative social learning processes among actors that can enable and ensure governance interventions that bot言外之意 发表于 2025-3-28 13:05:29
Conclusionquity and fuel the erosion of the ecological basis of the world, the urgent need for transformative change is palpable. Agroecology responds to this call for change. Our formulation of agroecological transformation reflects not one grand theory of change but a recognition of a co-evolutionary and ad